Inspection readings sit in contractor reports, work history in your CMMS, process data in the historian. AccurAPM puts them on one equipment record, so every inspection interval, FFS result and RCA finding traces back to its evidence.
Book a 30-minute technical demo with an integrity engineer, on your own data. We reply within one business day.
With an integrity engineer, on your own data. We reply within one business day.
400+ tanks, pressure vessels and piping systems managed, onshore and offshoreIn service with oil and gas operators in EgyptCloud or on-premises
Readings arrive as PDFs at the end of each campaign and are re-keyed into spreadsheets. Each contractor brings its own template. CML names drift, and a short-term corrosion rate gets calculated against the wrong baseline.
The CMMS holds the equipment and the work orders. Integrity studies keep a register of their own. Recommendations get re-typed into notifications by hand, if they get there at all.
A temperature excursion sits in the historian. The corrosion loop it affected is reassessed months later as if it never happened.
“There was widespread use of Excel spreadsheets, often stored on local computer drives.”
The same review found installation records that were not transferred effectively when ownership changed.
Source: HSE, Key Programme 4 (KP4): Ageing and life extension programme, 2014, p. 32 and p. 30.
AccurAPM Core holds a single asset hierarchy, with as many levels as your plant needs, and every module reads from and writes to it. Data comes in from the systems that already hold it. Approved actions go back to the system that carries them out.
SAP master data, functional locations and work history are synchronised into AccurAPM through AccurELT. Notifications and work orders are written back. Bi-directional integration is also available for IBM Maximo and Oracle.
CMMS integrationOPC and OPC-UA tags are mapped to equipment and checked against integrity operating windows set up in line with API RP 584. Each excursion is recorded with its start time, duration, severity and affected corrosion loop.
Historian & IOWReadings are logged against fixed CMLs, whichever contractor took them. Long- and short-term corrosion rates come from the full history.
Inspection data managementEach stage feeds the next and works from the same asset hierarchy, so a decision taken in one module is visible in the others. An IOW excursion recorded during execution can be reviewed alongside the RBI risk for the same corrosion loop when the plan comes up for review.
AccurAPM’s AI features read your asset data together with the engineering knowledge built into the platform, then produce a draft. An engineer checks it and signs it off. Nothing the AI produces changes an inspection interval, a risk ranking or a work order without an engineer’s approval.
AccurPulse extracts structured data from PDF drawings and technical documents and supports CML annotation, so years of contractor reports can be loaded and checked instead of re-typed.
AccurPulseAI Copilot answers questions about your assets, inspections and CMMS work history. Query Composer sets what it can read: the whole system, or only the data set you define.
AccurPulseThe engineering knowledge is what AccurAPM already holds: its failure mode library, the method logic of 5 Whys, Fishbone and Fault Tree analysis, and your organisation’s past investigations.
| Discipline | Methodology implemented |
|---|---|
| Risk-Based Inspection | API RP 580 and API RP 581 |
| Fitness-For-Service | API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, 2021 Edition, Level 1 and Level 2 |
| Integrity Operating Windows | In line with API RP 584 |
AccurAPM implements these methodologies to support your engineers’ assessments. Sign-off stays with your engineers.
Runs on your own servers, so your inspection history stays inside your network.
On-premises listing on Microsoft MarketplaceAccess control, in both: LDAP user groups or managed users, with role and data-level permissions.
Asset performance management software brings inspection, integrity, reliability and maintenance information onto one asset model so decisions about equipment are made from a single record of its condition, risk and history. It sits between engineering assessment and maintenance execution, converting condition and risk into prioritized inspection and maintenance plans.
A CMMS schedules and records maintenance work. AccurAPM decides what should be inspected or maintained and when, by assessing damage mechanisms, risk, criticality and remaining life, then passes that plan to the CMMS. AccurAPM integrates with CMMS platforms including SAP, IBM Maximo and Oracle, reading equipment, functional location and work history, and writing back notifications and work orders.
Yes. AccurAPM runs in the cloud or entirely on your own network. On-premises deployment matters for operators whose integrity and process data cannot leave their infrastructure. User accounts can be created through your existing LDAP group or manually, and roles, sites and data permissions are configured per customer. The cloud version runs on Microsoft Azure, and both versions are listed on Microsoft Marketplace.
AccurAPM implements API 580 and API 581 for risk-based inspection, API 584 for integrity operating windows, and ASME material data with Tmin calculation. Pipeline integrity follows DNV-RP-F116, ASME B31.8S and API RP 1160. Fitness-For-Service assessments follow API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. AccurAPM supports the engineer's assessment; sign-off stays with your engineers.
Book a 30-minute technical demo with an integrity engineer, on your own data. We reply within one business day.
When we reply, send a sample of your equipment register and one inspection report. In the 30-minute session an integrity engineer will show how they map onto a single AccurAPM equipment record.
